Full Description

The objective of this research project was to develop and optimize enhanced biological phosphorusremoval (EBPR) technology in membrane bioreactors (MBR). Further investigations for nitrogenremoval were conducted to optimize the overall performance of MBR processes. The aim was toestablish cost effective strategies for upgrading small sewage treatment units (up to 10,000 PE), asneeded in some decentralized areas of Berlin.One MBR bench-scale plant of 200 to 250L (BSP) and two MBR pilot plants of 1 to 3m3 each (PP1and PP2) were operated in parallel to a conventional EBPR wastewater treatment plant (WWTPBerlin-Ruhleben, Germany). The membrane bioreactors were tested with EBPR configurations in predenitrification(PP1), and post-denitrification mode without additional carbon source (PP2). The MBRpilot and bench-scale plants were operated under sludge ages of respectively 26 and 15 days. Eightextended measurement programs (profile measurements, mass balance) were carried out during theconsidered period of 8 months (September 2001 - April 2002).The effluent concentration of total phosphorus was very low and stable between 0.05 and 0.16 mg/L inboth configurations. A comparison to the Ruhleben WWTP showed, that the effluent concentrationsfor COD, TN and TP were slightly lower for the MBR due to the absense of particulate fraction.Measurements along the multi-stage reactors showed that P-uptake occurred in the anoxic and theaerobic zones. The P-content of the biomass was about 2.1 - 2.6%P . With a nitrogen load of0.01 kgN/kgTS.d an average total nitrogen concentration of 2.5mg/L was monitored in the effluent ofpost-denitrification compared to 9.2mg/L for pre-denitrification. Under identical loading conditions,nitrogen removal was greater in PP2 with post-denitrification.The denitrification rate under operation conditions in the first anoxic reactor (AX1) was in average 1.4mgN/gVSS.hr for PP1 and 0.43 mgN/gVSS.hr for PP2. In the following anoxic reactors (AX2 andAX3), the denitrification rates were much lower for both configurations. Multi-stage reactor designensured that nitrate removal was complete in all profile measurements. In all measurements,denitrification rate was lower in PP with 26 days than in BSP and conventional WWTP with 15 days.But further investigations are necessary to evaluate the influence of parameter such as sludge age,oxygen transfer in anoxic reactor, etc.The assessment of membrane system performance was not the main focus of this first project phase,and the membrane units were operated below their optimum operation ranges. The objective was tominimize the use of chemicals due to the potential application in remote areas. The two PVDFmodules of the company Memcor were operated with 15 - 17 L/m^2.hr. Further data are requested toconclude whether process configurations (pre- and post-denitrification) or process conditions havesome influence on fouling rate.The project will be continued until April 2003. The second project phase will evaluate maximumnitrogen load different SRT and impact of various conditions on membrane performance. Further trialswith the BSP will be undertaken with another type of raw water coming from a decentralized area witha short retention and separate sewer. Includes 17 references, tables, figures.

Product Details

Edition: Vol. - No. Published: 03/05/2003 Number of Pages: 18File Size: 1 file , 420 KB